http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8O4MT6G1&show_article=1
So Obama is accusing Bush on pursuing a policy of "social Darwinism". He says it is leaving every man and woman struggling. He is complaining that the government has NO role to play in making sure that American is prosperous for ALL people and not just SOME people. Now folks, how many times have I been forced to bring this up because of some stupid democrat's remarks about this. It's NOT the governments job to ensure ALL Americans are prosperous....it's each an individual responsibility and/or choice to ensure prosper in America. This absolutely kills me that he would make this statement...he is taking a large steaming dump on what America stands for by making this statement. I thought the saying used to be "America - the land of OPPORTUNITY"...apparently now it is "America - the land where the government will take care of your sorry A$$ while you do nothing to improve your own life". These people who applauded his stupid statement are low life scums of society who would rather be taken care of, than take care of. This just shows you how Barack Obama (and for that matter, most other democrats) take advantage of the stupidity of their own voters.
The article also states that Obama, John Edwards, and Hillary Rodham Clinton (note she is now using Rodham so IF for some horrible reason she were to be elected, she will only be known as Hillary Rodham) each accused the Bush administration of "failing to look out for the average worker" and they vowed to make changes if they are elected. What about the average worker looking out for themselves?
Here is the part that really gets me steamed up, and when I say steamed up...I mean PISSED OFF. Hillary said Bush should have used the opportunity of a unified nation after 9/11 to make the country energy independent or provide universal health care. What in the HELL does that mean!?!?! How does that have ANYTHING to do with 9/11??? If somebody can give me a legitimate answer to that, I would greatly appreciate it. She said "We were waiting for the president to seize the moment to say, let's take this time and let's become energy independent so we're not sending money to people who fund those who then turn around and attack us,"......WHAAAAAT!!! I cannot even put into words what I want to call her right now. Well you know what psycho lady....if you idiot democrats would let us, WE WOULD!!! Does ANWR mean anything to you!!! Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz.
Now hear is the real kicker...the article says "The White House had no immediate comment". THAT is the part that really aggravates me. If I were President...and clearly I'm not nor could ever be elected...I DEFINITELY would have set them straight on all of these ridiculous comments. I would have made them look like the fools they really are. I would verbally squash them and show everybody what lying worthless slimes they are. Bush has been a dissapointment as a President and this is one of the reasons why...no backbone...I don't know how he stands sometimes. And make no mistake about it, this is not only a problem with Bush, but with MANY republicans. I've seen floormats that don't get walked all over as much as they do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
you should run for president... i'd vote for you...
Unfortunately, 1 vote does not get you into the President spot.
VOTE LIBERTARIAN!!!!!!!!!!
well.. we could spread the word!
How did you get on the internet Megan??? And why are you on the internet when you are AT THE BEACH!!!
Ok, seriously... I checked out the original article and it's quite interesting. Here is a quote you didn't fully mention in your post, Bruce... "Clinton said she wanted to return to a time when the country and it's leaders had big goals and achieved them—like improving civil rights or sending a man to the moon. She said she wished President Bush would have used the opportunity of a unified nation after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to make the country energy independent or provide universal health care."
Ok. The problem here is that Hilary plays to people's anti-Bush sympathies but no one seems to realize these are really vague and unnecessary statements. So yes, it WOULD be great to be energy independent. (hello Alaska) But I agree, Bruce, that the immediate aftermath of 9/11 generated MUCH more emotional and personal interest in humanity than support for a general political motive - which is a country that is completely self-sufficient. You can't deny that Hilary is clever enough to realize that the majority of our society is sadly unsupportive of our President. And you hit the nail on the head Bruce when you say he simply has no back-bone. Bush has (had) great potential to do wonderful things for our country but he just doesn't seem strong enough emotionally to handle what needs to be done and say OK folks, this is how it is and if you don't like it then tough shit. So Obama and Hilary are simply being smart politicians and issuing generic statements where the subject itself isn't so important as the feeling it generates within the people. Case in point...relate to the ONE most significant achievement in our society's recent history...landing on the moon. People emotionally connect to that statement and may not even realize that it's all fluff. They say, oh yes..she's right! We haven't done anything significant, we've been under attack, and our kids are over-seas. Sadly, this is all people need to be swayed to a particular candidate. It's not always about the "issues" at hand, it's how a person can relate to others.
WoW Meg, taking time out from Spring Break at the beach with concern about our country. Good for you. It is nice to see that some of the younger generation is taking an interest. Come on Meg, spread the word. How about lobbying?? You would be good at it. Kim, I would say that there are so many people out there that just vote to vote and know nothing about who they are voting for. That is one problem we have. Just talk to some people on the street and they will tell you, I don't know about him but my family always voted this way so that is what I do. I have heard this from so many people.
Ahh, you see Kim, I did mention that. Read the 2nd to last paragraph.
That is what makes me mad. I know her agenda but the stupid people hearing bits and pieces of what she says does not and that is who supports her.
"She wants to return to a time when the country and it's leaders had big goals and achieved them—like improving civil rights or sending a man to the moon." YEAH FREAKIN RIGHT! Half of that is right. She would love to improve "civil rights"...but not how you think of them. She wants to improve civil rights for ALL people, not just civilians of the USA. And the man on the moon thing, that was just thrown in there to make her sound more "American". She could care less about that.
Everything that comes out of that woman's mouth is BS. ALL SHE WANTS IS POWER.
And no, she is not playing to anti-Bush emotions. She, as almost all Democrats do, is playing off of the stupidity of the American public.
Ok so granted, I should have taken out the second part of that quote that you already referenced. It was the man on the moon bit that piqued my curiosity. You say she only wants power and I couldn't agree more. If it weren't true, then she and ole Bill would have been divorced long ago. What can I say, she bugs the crap out of me. Your blog has inspired me to do a bit more research and I have found some interesting things on Hillary's (two l's apparently) website. One thing in particular is this article regarding Hillary's involvement with the Circuit City layoffs. Ok, so she's running for President and obviously wants to show that she's "for the people" but seriously, doesn't she have better things to do with her time than to worry about ONE corporation's layoffs? Give me a freaking break! Here's the link to the story...some of the comments on the original blog post are really interesting to read.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1423
OMG she's an IDIOT!!! See!!! She is already sticking her nose in corporations' business. She, nor any other member of congress, has any business telling a corporation what or what not to do when it comes to strategic planning or any other part of their business. Unless of course it is not within the law but that is what the Justice Department is for.
This should be a huge indication of what she believes in - government involvement in the economy. Now see, if she were President, she would probably be trying to pass some kind of law disallowing them from doing this. AHHHHHHH!!!! I just get so mad when I think that there are actually people who support this witch.
And yeah, I didn't hear anything about her saying anything about any of the other hundreds of companies that have layed people off recently. She probably has a family member or friend getting laid off.
Thanks for the story Kim.
http://clinton.senate.gov/~clinton/news/statements/details.cfm?id=271682&&
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/04/04/sniping-at-circuit-city/
Read some of this crap guys. Here we go again. Government getting into business they should stay out of. I could not get the link to work for me so I had to look up the article through google. I went to hillaries site and had to leave. Anyway, I cant even get into this. If is Friday and I am happy, lol. I need Rum Drinks.
i got on the internet because i brought my laptop.. and this is the only site i went on when i was down there. yepp..
Post a Comment